Price: | S$80.18 - S$153.82 |
- Lace-up running shoe featuring breathable mesh upper with padded tongue/collar
- Stabilizing dynamic duomax support system
- Rearfoot and forefoot gel cushioning systems
Have a question?
Find answers in product info, Q&As, reviews
Your question might be answered by sellers, manufacturers or customers who bought this product.
Please make sure that you've entered a valid question. You can edit your question or post anyway.
Please enter a question.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product description
You wouldn't leave home without having had a well balanced breakfast, right? They why miss out on the bread and butter of your running routine by skipping the opportunity to lace into the ASICS® GT-2000™ 4 running shoe?! Predecessor: GT-2000 3. Support Type: Overpronation/Stability. Cushioning: High energizing cushioning. Surface: Road. Differential: 10 mm. Breathable mesh and synthetic upper materials. Lace-up closure. Discrete eyelets disburse lace tension for optimal comfort. Soft, plush tongue and collar. Heel Clutching System™ is made up of an exoskeletal heel counter that promotes an improved fit and increased support. ComforDry™ sockliner offers antimicrobial properties for a drier, healthier environment. I.G.S® (Impact Guidance System) features linked components to enhance the foot's natural gait from heel strike through toe-off. Dynamic DuoMax® System increases stability and support with reduced weight and enhanced platform comfort. Rearfoot & forefoot GEL® cushioning systems work together to better attenuate impacting shock and allow the foot to move fluidly throughout the gait cycle. FluidRide™ midsole technology delivers a supreme combination of energy return and cushioning with reduced weight and lasting durability. Gender-specific cushioning features a lower-density midsole top layer that allows for ladies to better enjoy midsole compression benefits. Heel/Toe: 21 mm/11 mm AHAR® is strategically placed throughout high-wear areas of the outsole. Guidance Line® technology employs a vertical flex groove that decouples the tooling along the line of progression for maximum stride efficiency. Guidance Trusstic System® integrates Guidance Line construction to enhance gait efficiency while promoting mid-foot structural integrity. Imported. Measurements: Weight: 14 oz Product measurements were taken using size 8.5, width D - Wide. Please note that measurements may vary by size.
Product details
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- Package dimensions : 29.72 x 18.8 x 11.43 cm; 399.16 Grams
- Date First Available : 30 December 2015
- Manufacturer : ASICS
- ASIN : B00YDNEKGK
- Item model number : GT-2000 4-W
- Department : Womens
-
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: 19,821 in Sporting Goods (See Top 100 in Sporting Goods)
- #1901 in Women's Shoes
- #398 in Running Shoes
- #1401 in Sports & Recreation Footwear
- Customer reviews:
No customer reviews
5 star (0%) |
|
0% |
4 star (0%) |
|
0% |
3 star (0%) |
|
0% |
2 star (0%) |
|
0% |
1 star (0%) |
|
0% |
Most helpful customer reviews on Amazon.com


Reviewed in the United States on 26 October 2016



Any more we are sold a flimsy 'sneaker sock' in a variety of wild designs and pretty colors that breaks down in a matter of months after any kind of regular use. Laces not included. lol
A true "sport" shoe other than those designed for the professional has become extinct.
This model, as mentioned in the header, are specifically designed for mild to moderate overpronators where the arch collapses and the foot rolls inward, looking like you have weak ankles, or flat feet.
If you have a neutral arch and gait, or even a high arch, you may wanna click on past these bc the ergonomics of this shoe may be very uncomfortable for you and cause your shins to hurt. I hear the Asics Gel Nimbus are excellent for that foot type. I have been wearing Asics for maybe 10 years and pretty much stick with their 3 styles that are designed for my foot type: the GT 1000 (a walking shoe), GT 2000 (running) or Asics Gel Kayano (i'd go for the 22 over the latest version, 23) - a lightweight running shoe but also just a great all-around shoe for being on your feet all day. My suggestion is, no matter which brand you prefer, head to their web site and see the product descriptions and which line they recommend for your foot type. (Mizuno, Saucony also have well designed shoes for overpronators)
With regard to the Asics GT 2000 (4), I had to postpone writing this review bc I've been angry and frustrated with ea new iteration of their designs. I have older GT 2000 models in my usual size, a 6.5, that fit me just fine. It appears that "modernizing" their shoes equates to cost-corner cutting and how much cheaper can they produce the same shoe. It's a race to the bottom if you ask me. (no one asked) What I have found is high inconsistency in the product which come down to QC issues. I can order one pair in the 6.5 and love it! Order another pair in my 6.5 and couldn't shove my foot in there if my life depended on it. I've never had to 'size up' in these shoes. I'm pretty much of a consistent 6.5. I take that size in all the other brands I listed above (Mizuno's are great). Here, it took me several tries before I realized it's not so much the width (others have mentioned the shoe runs narrow), but the sizing. IT RUNS SMALL. ORDER A HALF SIZE UP!
Here's the change: the latest models are not as deep from sole (bottom of the shoe) to the top of the shoe, cramming the toe box. It's not so much width or length, it's depth. They don't come up as high, like on the back of the heel, ankle support, depth of tread.
I will say that the materials have improved and there is still really good heel support, arch support and these are a solid shoe. I'm not thrilled that I had to size up bc it means that sometimes the shoe could feel a bit sloppy on the foot. However, I can wear cushy socks that are a bit thicker and have an insert. The little bit of extra room just makes it all the more comfortable.
I have a few of the major brands and comparatively speaking these are definitely top of the line all around. I'd say Mizuno gives these a run for their money (they run TTS) but I can tell these will hold up better over time.
Net net: Quality shoe worth the $. Size up and save yourself the frustration of shipping back and forth!


Reviewed in the United States on 9 May 2017


I have been running in Asics for over 15 years, and was in need of two new pairs to replace my old 2000 4s. These were supposed to be exactly the same model. This is what I found: I ordered my first pair - size 8 normal width, what I usually wear in running shoes. I am a 7.5 size regular shoe, but you always should size up 1/2 size from your normal size in athletic shoes to allow for the swelling of the feet during exercise.
Got my first pair of these. They looked legit, so I ordered another pair to have on the way. I had not tested these out yet. My mistake. I compared them, size wise, to my shot 2000 4s, and found that they areexactly the same width/length as my old 2000 4s. Pics are attached. My shot orange shoes are on the left, the new gray/blue on the right. Same size. So if you are wondering if these run small. No they do not, if you are replacing the same model. If you are comparing them to old/newer models, there probably are discrepancies. Asics is known to changing things every year.
However, thats not what went wrong for me. I only had these for not even a week, and tried about 3 runs/walks in my new pair. Every single time, post run, my right foot was in such bad pain that I'd have to completely stay off my foot for the next day. Even walking hurt. Then, I'd try again. Every time, I'd take my right shoe off, and my foot was so messed up. The only way I can describe it is that it was like the right shoe was off kilter and it felt like I had been running at an angle on that foot for the duration where my foot wanted to step down on the outer edge of my foot. It was completely messing up my gait, and my whole foot would be in such pain that I couldnt even walk flat footed on that right foot for the rest of the day.
I got my second pair that I ordered--- same exact shoe -- and pulled out the right shoe from the new box and put it next to the new right shoe I had been trying to run in with such problems. Pic is included. After taking pics and staring at both right shoes, I noticed that the one that was giving me issues was noticably shorter; the grey band that came around the back was lower than the other new rt foot pair, and the heel part (rbber) didnt come up as high as the other shoe. The new right shoe is on the left, the bad right one that was giving me such issues is on the right. If you look closely, you will see across how the left sits higher and the patterns dont match across. I knew that something in the shoe I was wearing hadnt been right, and now I could see it. Either the heel drop was lower, uneven, or something. But I wasnt imagining it.
I wrapped up both new pairs, and returnedthem straight back to Amazon. I purchased them on Amazon via shoecity. They should be identical, but they were not. The pain from the bad shoe was enough that I almost thought I was getting a running injury. I will not buy running shoes from unknown vendors anymore, please stick with direct purchases from Asics/Brooks etc... so that you know you aregetting an authentic shoe or you can contact the company and they can assist since they know their own running shoes. Never again.

Reviewed in the United States on 2 June 2018
I have been running in Asics for over 15 years, and was in need of two new pairs to replace my old 2000 4s. These were supposed to be exactly the same model. This is what I found: I ordered my first pair - size 8 normal width, what I usually wear in running shoes. I am a 7.5 size regular shoe, but you always should size up 1/2 size from your normal size in athletic shoes to allow for the swelling of the feet during exercise.
Got my first pair of these. They looked legit, so I ordered another pair to have on the way. I had not tested these out yet. My mistake. I compared them, size wise, to my shot 2000 4s, and found that they areexactly the same width/length as my old 2000 4s. Pics are attached. My shot orange shoes are on the left, the new gray/blue on the right. Same size. So if you are wondering if these run small. No they do not, if you are replacing the same model. If you are comparing them to old/newer models, there probably are discrepancies. Asics is known to changing things every year.
However, thats not what went wrong for me. I only had these for not even a week, and tried about 3 runs/walks in my new pair. Every single time, post run, my right foot was in such bad pain that I'd have to completely stay off my foot for the next day. Even walking hurt. Then, I'd try again. Every time, I'd take my right shoe off, and my foot was so messed up. The only way I can describe it is that it was like the right shoe was off kilter and it felt like I had been running at an angle on that foot for the duration where my foot wanted to step down on the outer edge of my foot. It was completely messing up my gait, and my whole foot would be in such pain that I couldnt even walk flat footed on that right foot for the rest of the day.
I got my second pair that I ordered--- same exact shoe -- and pulled out the right shoe from the new box and put it next to the new right shoe I had been trying to run in with such problems. Pic is included. After taking pics and staring at both right shoes, I noticed that the one that was giving me issues was noticably shorter; the grey band that came around the back was lower than the other new rt foot pair, and the heel part (rbber) didnt come up as high as the other shoe. The new right shoe is on the left, the bad right one that was giving me such issues is on the right. If you look closely, you will see across how the left sits higher and the patterns dont match across. I knew that something in the shoe I was wearing hadnt been right, and now I could see it. Either the heel drop was lower, uneven, or something. But I wasnt imagining it.
I wrapped up both new pairs, and returnedthem straight back to Amazon. I purchased them on Amazon via shoecity. They should be identical, but they were not. The pain from the bad shoe was enough that I almost thought I was getting a running injury. I will not buy running shoes from unknown vendors anymore, please stick with direct purchases from Asics/Brooks etc... so that you know you aregetting an authentic shoe or you can contact the company and they can assist since they know their own running shoes. Never again.




