False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet Hardcover – Illustrated, 13 August 2020
by
Bjorn Lomborg
(Author)
See all formats and editions
Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
|
New from | Used from |
Hardcover, Illustrated
""
|
S$46.30
|
S$30.88 | — |
Arrives: 8 - 11 Feb. Details
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us AllMichael ShellenbergerHardcover
- The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the WorldBjørn LomborgPaperback
- How to Spend $75 Billion to Make the World a Better PlaceBjorn LomborgPaperback
- The Mystery of Life's Origin: The Continuing ControversyCharles B ThaxtonPaperback
- False Alarm: The Truth about the Epidemic of FearMarc SiegelPaperback
- The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate ChangeMarc MoranoPaperback
New Year, New You
Ideas to start the year
Shop now
Product details
- Language: : English
- Hardcover : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1541647467
- ISBN-13 : 978-1541647466
-
Best Sellers Rank:
38,113 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 79 in Environmental Economics
- 1,087 in Government & Politics
- 2,520 in Science & Nature
- Customer reviews:
Product description
Review
False Alarm is a timely and important book. Based on the latest scientific evidence and rigorous economic analysis, it provides a welcome antidote to widespread, irrational panic about a coming climate apocalypse. Instead, it provides a set of smart, rational policies for addressing global warming -- while not losing sight of the myriad other problems that beset our planet, including poverty and inequality. This book is essential reading for anyone who cares about our shared human future.--Justin Yifu Lin, former chief economist, the World Bank
"An excellent summary of the madness, hypocrisy, and cynicism of the climate-alarm establishment.... Lomborg has done an excellent job pointing out that climate fears are indeed a 'false alarm, ' misdirecting time and resources away from real, and soluble, problems."--New Criterion
[Lomborg] follows his previous critiques of climate change policy...with a hard-hitting analysis of failing strategies for addressing what he acknowledges is 'a real problem.'...A serious, debatable assessment of a controversial global issue.--Kirkus
An important book. Mr. Lomborg is a long-standing environmentalist regarded as a heretic by hardliners in the movement because he is an optimist who says that humanity is not doomed.--Iain Martin, The Times (UK)
Bjorn Lomborg is that rare thing: a clear-sighted realist about climate change. In False Alarm, he argues that it would be foolish to do nothing to prepare for a warmer planet, but it would be more foolish to pretend that we are doing things that will significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions when we are not. At the same time, getting serious about cutting CO2 emissions will have a cost. As Lomborg says, vastly more people die as a consequence of poverty and disease each year than die as a consequence of global warming. As in the past, we humans are capable of adapting to climate change in ways that can significantly mitigate its adverse effects, without choking off economic growth. To learn how, you must read False Alarm.--Niall Ferguson, the Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Bjorn Lomborg's new book offers a data-driven, human-centered antidote to the oft-apocalyptic discussion characterizing the effect of human activity on the global climate. Careful, compelling, and above all sensible and pragmatic.--Jordan Peterson, author of 12 Rules for Life
Lomborg brands climate change warnings as alarmist, and argues that a massive reduction in fossil fuels would exacerbate global poverty, in this detailed account.... Lomborg is careful to back his cost-benefit analyses of climate policies with surveys and statistics.--Publishers Weekly
Lomborg does not lack solutions. In False Alarm, he advocates a range of cost-benefit tested policies to address both climate change and global poverty.... Lomborg does a service in calling out the environmental alarmism and hysteria that obscure environmental debates rather than illuminate them.--National Review
Lomborg's most basic premise remains that there are better ways to alleviate human misery than spending taxpayer subsidies than on panic-driven, political non-solutions to a changing climate. Few would argue with that goal.--American Thinker
Meticulously researched, and well worth a read.--Forbes
"An excellent summary of the madness, hypocrisy, and cynicism of the climate-alarm establishment.... Lomborg has done an excellent job pointing out that climate fears are indeed a 'false alarm, ' misdirecting time and resources away from real, and soluble, problems."--New Criterion
[Lomborg] follows his previous critiques of climate change policy...with a hard-hitting analysis of failing strategies for addressing what he acknowledges is 'a real problem.'...A serious, debatable assessment of a controversial global issue.--Kirkus
An important book. Mr. Lomborg is a long-standing environmentalist regarded as a heretic by hardliners in the movement because he is an optimist who says that humanity is not doomed.--Iain Martin, The Times (UK)
Bjorn Lomborg is that rare thing: a clear-sighted realist about climate change. In False Alarm, he argues that it would be foolish to do nothing to prepare for a warmer planet, but it would be more foolish to pretend that we are doing things that will significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions when we are not. At the same time, getting serious about cutting CO2 emissions will have a cost. As Lomborg says, vastly more people die as a consequence of poverty and disease each year than die as a consequence of global warming. As in the past, we humans are capable of adapting to climate change in ways that can significantly mitigate its adverse effects, without choking off economic growth. To learn how, you must read False Alarm.--Niall Ferguson, the Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Bjorn Lomborg's new book offers a data-driven, human-centered antidote to the oft-apocalyptic discussion characterizing the effect of human activity on the global climate. Careful, compelling, and above all sensible and pragmatic.--Jordan Peterson, author of 12 Rules for Life
Lomborg brands climate change warnings as alarmist, and argues that a massive reduction in fossil fuels would exacerbate global poverty, in this detailed account.... Lomborg is careful to back his cost-benefit analyses of climate policies with surveys and statistics.--Publishers Weekly
Lomborg does not lack solutions. In False Alarm, he advocates a range of cost-benefit tested policies to address both climate change and global poverty.... Lomborg does a service in calling out the environmental alarmism and hysteria that obscure environmental debates rather than illuminate them.--National Review
Lomborg's most basic premise remains that there are better ways to alleviate human misery than spending taxpayer subsidies than on panic-driven, political non-solutions to a changing climate. Few would argue with that goal.--American Thinker
Meticulously researched, and well worth a read.--Forbes
About the Author
Bjorn Lomborg is the best-selling author of The Skeptical Environmentalist and Cool It. He is a visiting professor at Copenhagen Business School and at the Hoover Institution at Stanford. His work appears regularly in New York Times, Wall Street Journal, the Economist, the Atlantic, and Forbes. His monthly column appears in around 40 papers in 19 languages, with more than 30 million readers. In 2011 and 2012, Lomborg was named Top 100 Global Thinker by Foreign Policy. In 2008 he was named "one of the 50 people who could save the planet" by the Guardian. He lives in Prague.
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us AllMichael ShellenbergerHardcover
- How to Spend $75 Billion to Make the World a Better PlaceBjorn LomborgPaperback
- Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity--And Why This Harms EverybodyHelen PluckroseHardcover
- Unreported Truths About Covid-19 and Lockdowns: Part 3: MasksAlex BerensonPaperback
- The Mystery of Life's Origin: The Continuing ControversyCharles B ThaxtonPaperback
- Live Not by Lies: A Manual for Christian DissidentsRod DreherHardcover
No customer reviews
5 star (0%) |
|
0% |
4 star (0%) |
|
0% |
3 star (0%) |
|
0% |
2 star (0%) |
|
0% |
1 star (0%) |
|
0% |
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we do not use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Most helpful customer reviews on Amazon.com
Amazon.com:
4.6 out of 5 stars
70 reviews

Kelly Harbeson
3.0 out of 5 stars
Still beating a dead horse
16 July 2020 -
Published on Amazon.comVerified Purchase
I can't give this more than three stars because, even though it is well written and well argued, in the first pages he rails against the media for giving "climate change deniers" outlets for their views "that they don't deserve". In the first place there are NO climate change "deniers". Skeptics of AGW do not deny that climate is changing. Most have argued, as does Lomberg himself, that alarmism is not warranted by the facts on the ground. Lomberg has long argued that economic considerations should be forefront in any discussion of Climate Change policies, but he doesn't admit that the whole AGW argument is on shakey ground since the climate "hiatus" beginning in 1998. There has been no trend, up or down since then. A few warm years followed by a few cool years. Just like ever. Be somewhat skeptical of any prescriptions based on AGW, no matter that economics informs them.
45 people found this helpful

Kindle Customer
3.0 out of 5 stars
Mixed Bag - but useful refutation of a lot of stuff and nonsense
29 July 2020 -
Published on Amazon.comVerified Purchase
Calls out a lot of nonsense, but regurgitates a lot of hysteric cult dogma too.
While it is useful to have a book that attempts to place climate change in a reasonable context relative to other opportunities for human improvement, this book just has too much cognitive dissonance to be a great book.
First off, Lomborg gives away the store by claiming a scientific consensus. Page 6 states : "Scientists agree that global warming is mostly caused by humans, and there has been little change in the impacts they project for temperature and sea level rise." This is false. There are many projections as the common spaghetti graph chart of models demonstrates. Second, Lomborg refers to "pre-industrial revolution temperatures" as some sort of baseline for the planetary average global temperature he would posit as some sort of ideal even though the industrial revolution began in the middle of the Little Ice Age. And what pre-industrial revolution temperature was the norm? That of the Medieval Warm Period? And what exactly would the ideal temperature for a geo-engineered climate be? Because these are tough questions, natural climate variability denialism has become popular among hysterics but Lomborg pays no attention. Worst, Lomborg claims that there is some kind of consensus that by 2100 the average global temperature will be 7.2 degrees F warmer than ?? but that is the RCP 8.5 projection and if there is any consensus at all it may be that the RCP 8.5 projection is highly unlikely and useless to policy makers.
But other than those minor quibbles, the book is a useful refutation of a lot of the drivel the public is so regularly subjected to.
While it is useful to have a book that attempts to place climate change in a reasonable context relative to other opportunities for human improvement, this book just has too much cognitive dissonance to be a great book.
First off, Lomborg gives away the store by claiming a scientific consensus. Page 6 states : "Scientists agree that global warming is mostly caused by humans, and there has been little change in the impacts they project for temperature and sea level rise." This is false. There are many projections as the common spaghetti graph chart of models demonstrates. Second, Lomborg refers to "pre-industrial revolution temperatures" as some sort of baseline for the planetary average global temperature he would posit as some sort of ideal even though the industrial revolution began in the middle of the Little Ice Age. And what pre-industrial revolution temperature was the norm? That of the Medieval Warm Period? And what exactly would the ideal temperature for a geo-engineered climate be? Because these are tough questions, natural climate variability denialism has become popular among hysterics but Lomborg pays no attention. Worst, Lomborg claims that there is some kind of consensus that by 2100 the average global temperature will be 7.2 degrees F warmer than ?? but that is the RCP 8.5 projection and if there is any consensus at all it may be that the RCP 8.5 projection is highly unlikely and useless to policy makers.
But other than those minor quibbles, the book is a useful refutation of a lot of the drivel the public is so regularly subjected to.
33 people found this helpful

Drjackl
4.0 out of 5 stars
Must Read!
17 July 2020 -
Published on Amazon.comVerified Purchase
This book like Apocalypse Never uses a solid approach to assessing the impact of climate change, climate change policy and misreporting of climate change reality. It’s sometimes hard to work through the data, so the book would be significantly improved by aa summary showing exactly how little will be achieved by the Paris accord and similar massively expensive policy solutions. The bottom line is that climate change is being overblown by media looking for readers, by politicians looking for votes and by green organizations looking for subsidies and beneficial regulations. A more rational approach is needed, for sure. His proposals are interesting. His data are also interesting, but data rarely convinces religious followers of the climate gods. They are caught up by emotion and not susceptible to factual arguments. Good book, though.
28 people found this helpful

Minh Nguyen
5.0 out of 5 stars
The current green movement is a deeply anti-humanistic death cult that must be stopped!
30 July 2020 -
Published on Amazon.comVerified Purchase
A young friend of mine recently contemplated putting an early stop to her well-going art career to become a full-time climate activist. Needless to say, this would amount to nothing globally. But personally, it would also be a terribly negative turn in her life, wasting away all of the previous efforts, passionate study, and the early success she accrued thus far. Yet under the right conditioning, having been sufficiently brainwashed into the alarmism, it is a perfectly rational decision to make if you truly believe the world will end before your natural life runs out.
This personal anecdote is far from being the worst example of the harm that climate alarmism will cause us all. All over the western world, green "protestors" are blocking traffic, disrupting the daily lives of innocent civilians; in extreme cases even preventing ambulances and first responders from doing their jobs. Again, having sufficient faith in the axiom of the climate apocalypse, none of this behavior is irrational. Nothing can possibly trump saving the planet and all life on Earth.
Next time you come across, say, an Extinction Rebel in England, try to tell them that not only the world is not going to end but also that by the end of the century it is likely that we will have eradicated abject poverty from the face of the Earth. Show them that the polar bear population has in fact increased and that the Northern Hemisphere now has more trees than it did 100 years ago. Ask them to join you in rejoicing over the bright future of mankind. What do you think would be their reaction? Shouts, screeches, and possibly violence would be their response, as a few Youtubers have demonstrated. Strange, is it not? For a group of people beating the drum of planetary salvation to be so hostile to the possibly bright outcome of our world.
Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel prize laureate, described Bjorn's book as "pollution of the mind" in what he calls a review on Lomborg's work but to me seems a lot like a miserably failed hit piece. Notice the deeply orthodox religious language. Did it become normal now for Nobel prize holders to argue in such irrelevant terms as opposed to providing actual facts and data? By the way, if you are interested, Lomborg himself has posted a response to the criticism.
Having watched many of Bjorn Lomborg's lectures and presentations, I understand that he is very hesitant to attribute malice instead of ignorance to people. But we see climate alarmists all over the world propping up children to follow the lead of Greta Thunberg, pumping them full of rage and hatred, cheering them on as they stop their education to scream at adults on the streets. We see the extremists openly calling for policies that would coerce the developing world into curbing their development, which would undoubtedly lead to lives lost. We see news anchors shaming women who decide to become mothers, accusing them of doing net harm to future humanity. This will lead to a culture of madness.
How would you prove that the top proponents of this movement actually have good intentions? How to reconcile words and actions that are so far apart? The answer is that the green movement has now become a religious death cult that has all of the negative aspects of traditional religions but possesses none of their moral wisdom. It has whipped its followers into a death craze, replacing the concept of original sin with carbon dioxide, and offering a twisted sense of salvation through the deprecation of humanity. If it did not start out this way, it surely has been hijacked. Now we have to put a stop to the extremism and bring environmentalism back on a much more moderate track.
This personal anecdote is far from being the worst example of the harm that climate alarmism will cause us all. All over the western world, green "protestors" are blocking traffic, disrupting the daily lives of innocent civilians; in extreme cases even preventing ambulances and first responders from doing their jobs. Again, having sufficient faith in the axiom of the climate apocalypse, none of this behavior is irrational. Nothing can possibly trump saving the planet and all life on Earth.
Next time you come across, say, an Extinction Rebel in England, try to tell them that not only the world is not going to end but also that by the end of the century it is likely that we will have eradicated abject poverty from the face of the Earth. Show them that the polar bear population has in fact increased and that the Northern Hemisphere now has more trees than it did 100 years ago. Ask them to join you in rejoicing over the bright future of mankind. What do you think would be their reaction? Shouts, screeches, and possibly violence would be their response, as a few Youtubers have demonstrated. Strange, is it not? For a group of people beating the drum of planetary salvation to be so hostile to the possibly bright outcome of our world.
Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel prize laureate, described Bjorn's book as "pollution of the mind" in what he calls a review on Lomborg's work but to me seems a lot like a miserably failed hit piece. Notice the deeply orthodox religious language. Did it become normal now for Nobel prize holders to argue in such irrelevant terms as opposed to providing actual facts and data? By the way, if you are interested, Lomborg himself has posted a response to the criticism.
Having watched many of Bjorn Lomborg's lectures and presentations, I understand that he is very hesitant to attribute malice instead of ignorance to people. But we see climate alarmists all over the world propping up children to follow the lead of Greta Thunberg, pumping them full of rage and hatred, cheering them on as they stop their education to scream at adults on the streets. We see the extremists openly calling for policies that would coerce the developing world into curbing their development, which would undoubtedly lead to lives lost. We see news anchors shaming women who decide to become mothers, accusing them of doing net harm to future humanity. This will lead to a culture of madness.
How would you prove that the top proponents of this movement actually have good intentions? How to reconcile words and actions that are so far apart? The answer is that the green movement has now become a religious death cult that has all of the negative aspects of traditional religions but possesses none of their moral wisdom. It has whipped its followers into a death craze, replacing the concept of original sin with carbon dioxide, and offering a twisted sense of salvation through the deprecation of humanity. If it did not start out this way, it surely has been hijacked. Now we have to put a stop to the extremism and bring environmentalism back on a much more moderate track.
28 people found this helpful
Free & fast delivery, movies and more with Amazon Prime
Prime members enjoy free & fast delivery, exclusive access to movies, TV shows, games, and more.